Over the years we have seen GV posts evolve to more accurate, error free and meaningful. In the process, we have added steps, mainly sub-editing, which has brought good results. Now, some of the authors are saying that their unique writing signatures sometimes are being lost in the process as most of the times the leads, titles and sections are being rewritten by the sub-editors for the better. Can we think of training of authors on how to craft the story, title, authenticate sources, provide both sides of the argument etc so that their works turn up better? The editors are mentoring the authors, for now, but would be great if there is a structured training guide and process.